There comes a time in most women’s lives when you suddenly don’t have enough money. Whatever level you’re at, high-powered or unemployed, and whatever your outgoings are, you realise that there isn’t enough coming in. The situation may also be frog-in-a-pot gradual, and you’ve just been in denial about it.
And then you run into a girlfriend, and you rant at each other for a while, trying to dampen the panic. And then you might have The Conversation. If your friends are all incredibly sorted financially, or terribly disapproving, or you want to hide your situation, you may have The Conversation alone. (You may also had had this conversation with yourself after an abysmal one night stand, or while some grim liaison zombies itself to a close, and you stagger out of there, thinking, ‘I should be getting paid for this.’ Ah, there’s a clue.)
Yes, it’s the Prostitution Conversation. (Or sex work, if you will.) ‘How can I make money quickly?’ you think, desperate, and the thought goes round and round, and you remember all the bad sex you’ve had in your life, (for free!). You’ll discuss it for ages, and talk about people you know who’ve done it, and, if you’re of a middle-class liberal persuasion, guilt-trip yourselves for the awful privilege of being able to make the choice in the first place.
But still, your bank account is at five to midnight on the doomsday clock. And it’s extremely unfashionable to admit poverty nowadays. Newspapers, for the last decade, have been full of stories about how ‘we’ are all rich now. Even now, post-recession, the best most journos can manage is growing your own veg, recycling socks, or not getting your morning coffee from Starbucks any more. Few of the chatterati would dare admit anything tougher than that. But you would think newspapers paid in gold from the way some hacks bang on about their shopping lives, whether buying clothes, holidays, houses, or private health insurance. In fact, all sorts of people are really struggling right now. And some may well decide that the only solution is to sell sex. What money’s that short, considerations like health, personal safety, and the secret getting out to all and sundry, temporarily fall away.
However, talk usually remains just talk. Many are called, but few are chosen. When I was in my late 20s I knew a 19-year-old girl who’d been doing it for a while. ‘It’s the shopping you get addicted to,’ she said. She went on to marry a client, have kids, and did very well for herself. She was always telling me, ‘You could do it. You might not be in the top rank but you’d be fine.’ Around the same time, a lesbian friend went for an ‘audition-with-benefits’. She didn’t pursue it in the end, but the offer of the guy’s number was always there. Aged 29, I so nearly went through with it. But I didn’t. Others did. See, of course, Belle De Jour.
Lots of women also consider becoming dominatrixes, especially because you don’t have to have sex with the client. In fact many dommes dislike being called prostitutes for that very reason. But this is something that takes a certain skill. The pros make it look easy when it’s not. You might have the ‘You could do it, you’d be great,’ conversation with various girlfriends, but you are unlikely to make the grade, and it’s hard work. But many will consider it, as the bills flood in and the cheques bounce, and the fees go up.
The writer Glenda Richards wrote memorably about her date with a pimp when she was a struggling actor. Other women wrote to her and said that they too had stepped over the line. It may be that women are not as fragile as we are supposed to be. Certainly, in my experience, teenage and college sex, and the politics around it, was at times a demeaning and brutalising experience. I sometimes wonder if payment would have been adequate compensation, but it might have helped me get a deposit on a house in later years. It’s nice to get something back for your trouble, no?
And here is the bit of the conversation where, depending on the parties involved, it all splits, and you go through the red channel or the green channel and the two do not intersect. I am not going to rehearse all the arguments right now, as we’d be here all night. But fundamentally, (and there is certainly some fundamentalism here), in one corner there are the anti-sex work feminists who will say that every single woman who works in the adult industry is there by coercion, and that all women who sell sex are either drug addicts or being forced by pimps. I have been at dinner parties of intelligent educated women who will swear blind that this is true.
And then in the other corner there is the uncomfortable (for some) fact that some women work in the adult industry because they have chosen to do so. It insults them to imply that they are victims and need to be ‘saved’. But the two sides simply will not meet. I don’t really understand why it’s so hard to take in the idea that a) there are women in the adult industry who are being abused, and this needs to be stopped, but b) some women work in the adult industry because they want to, and accept that they are both true at the same time. The media doesn’t help, by either glamorising or demonising in equal measure.
Now I’ve got this far, I’ve realised I’ve got a huge amount to say about all this, and it just won’t go in one post. Plus I’d like to namecheck the bloggers, activists, and artists who are working to raise awareness of the issues here.
I am not saying anyone should sell sex. But the thought goes through many women’s minds, whether anyone likes it or not. Stepping over the line and actually doing it, of course, (more’s the point, more than once), is another thing.




Quiet Riot Girl
July 11, 2010
I just don’t get invited to middle class dinner parties anymore. I think they know I will spoil the conversatione…
Great post Tania. I don’t understand either why we can’t accept that there are sex workers who are coerced and exploited, as well as ones who aren’t. Accept that I do understand when I look at ‘feminism’ and what mainstream, puritanical, middle class feminism has to lose by accepting the complexities in sex work and what it means for our choices and agency as women. ‘Victim feminism’ relies on actual victims to roll out in front of us as exhibits (e.g. at dinner parties) and sex workers don’t half make great ‘victims’.
Sylvanus
July 11, 2010
in a way, it’s a relief to know that Americans are not the only ones who have trouble coping with complexity.
in my past life, when i lived in Los Angeles, i was very close to the porn industry…well, it’s fringes. And let’s just say that it is not the monolith people imagine it to be. There are a whole range of people there, from the abused, the damaged, and the very high-functioning, and it’s unfair to paint it all with the same brush. While i would not characterize sex work, largely, as a happy place, i also think that much of it comes from the fact that it has been marginalized and closeted, and that, (were wishes horses) if it were accepted, we wouldn’t have these issues. And, what i think your post captures so neatly is how the stigma affects every thought about it, rather than considering it on its own merits.
stephenpaterson
July 11, 2010
Tanya, this is a vast and complex subject to which my blog is devoted, do drop by sometime. Good post. Society has a sex work ‘problem’ problem.
dwfx
July 12, 2010
I am a very happy gay male sex worker. It is annoying that so many opinions on sex work are the result of a media fixation with sex work as either ultra glamorous or a living hell. The living hell option of course is favoured by that “type” of feminist who prefer their sex worker boxed and labelled under “Victim”.
Sex work is work and it has its good days and its bad days but unlike most forms of labour sex work is often unfairly stigmatised.
Sex workers challenge heterosexual and patriarchal notions of monogamy and especially female sexual autonomy which perhaps explains why we are such popular scape goats.
The truth is that the sex industry is complex and experiences differ so much. Sex work reflects the complexity of our society which the media finds difficult to represent or understand in the context of sex work.
Perhaps looking and reading some of the articles on http://www.harlotsparlour which is a pro feminist sex worker blog that tries to reflect some of this complexity may help a little in trying to understand sex work and sex workers.
taniaglyde
July 13, 2010
Thanks all for your interesting comments and links. I will be giving this more thought for another post.
bruceh2010
July 16, 2010
I couldn’t decide from your post whether this is to survive because you can’t find any other job or to enable you to continue as a ‘writer’?
taniaglyde
July 16, 2010
Bruce – it’s about not having enough money coming in, whatever a person does for a living.
By the way, why the inverted commas around what I do, and have been doing (among other things), for the last 20 years or so?
bruceh2010
July 18, 2010
The inverted commas only come in because it would then be a claimed profession to avoid stating the real one. It wasn’t meant to be denigratory.
I’m still not sure you’ve answered my question: I accept that there is not enough money coming in but you make it sound as though prostitution was the first thing you thought of.
taniaglyde
July 18, 2010
I haven’t at any point said there isn’t enough money coming in, and the whole point of the piece is to talk about how the thought of sex work comes into some womens’ when there isn’t enough money coming in, rather than, say, getting a market stall.
bruceh2010
July 20, 2010
Oh stupid me – I read the first sentence and thought that the time had come for you.
stephenpaterson
July 18, 2010
This seems to me perfectly logical. There can be few women who, given a really bad day at the office, haven’t thought: “Oh well, I guess I could always go on the game.” This seems to me normal, though I’m not entirely convinced it’s confined to the female sex, in fact I’m pretty certain it isn’t.
Anyway, I join countless thousands in looking forward in blissful anticipation to Part Two…